1. Is the collage striking, unpredictable and memorable? Is there an effective title on the slide?
2. Does the collage have a caption that explains it, briefly articulating the main point of the presentation – persuading viewers that the “go fix it” intervention proposed is both urgent and feasible?
3. Does the text provide detail on the complexity and magnitude of the problem the proposed intervention responds to?
4. Does the text provide a creative, well-conceived response to the problem detailed above, highlighted how the proposed intervention would advance environmental sustainability?
5. Does the text provide supporting details – on the aim of the intervention, on components of the intervention, on stakeholders, on likely barriers to the success of the intervention?
6. Does the presentation demonstrate in-depth engagement with its (at least two) academic references -- beyond the abstract?
7. Do (at least three) supporting links provide additional, useful information on the problem?
8. Are there appropriate citations throughout, for images as well as for information and quotations in the text?
9. Is the on-line presentation effectively organized?
10. Is there a complete biography, with links to at least annotations of at least two of the references?
“Go Fix It!” Wiki Post Evaluation
1. Is the collage striking, unpredictable and memorable? Is there an effective title on the slide?
2. Does the collage have a caption that explains it, briefly articulating the main point of the presentation – persuading viewers that the “go fix it” intervention proposed is both urgent and feasible?
3. Does the text provide detail on the complexity and magnitude of the problem the proposed intervention responds to?
4. Does the text provide a creative, well-conceived response to the problem detailed above, highlighted how the proposed intervention would advance environmental sustainability?
5. Does the text provide supporting details – on the aim of the intervention, on components of the intervention, on stakeholders, on likely barriers to the success of the intervention?
6. Does the presentation demonstrate in-depth engagement with its (at least two) academic references -- beyond the abstract?
7. Do (at least three) supporting links provide additional, useful information on the problem?
8. Are there appropriate citations throughout, for images as well as for information and quotations in the text?
9. Is the on-line presentation effectively organized?
10. Is there a complete biography, with links to at least annotations of at least two of the references?